Democracy is a fragile thing. It is sustained by strong institutions, trust, faithful leaders, and engaged citizens.
Recent media reports have brought to light attempts by the Communist regime in Beijing to meddle in our democracy and violate the safety and security of Canadians. A report in the Globe and Mail stated that my colleague MP Michael Chong’s family was targeted by Chinese diplomat Zhao Wei. These claims have since been validated by CSIS in a meeting with Michael.
Michael’s family abroad was targeted by Beijing security officials because of a parliamentary motion that condemned Beijing’s oppression of Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities and declared Beijing’s actions amounted to genocide.
What’s worse is that the Trudeau government knew about the Communist regime targeting Michael’s family, and they chose to do nothing. Michael did not know about these efforts to target his family until the story appeared in the Globe and Mail.
It is unacceptable that the government has known that an MP and his family had been targeted by Beijing for two years and did not inform him about the threats posed to his family. The diplomat in question, Zhao Wei, has faced no repercussions, and not a single Beijing diplomat has been expelled from Canada, despite actively interfering in Canadian politics.
Michael Chong is an incredible parliamentarian. He is thoughtful, intelligent, principled, and poised. I am lucky to count him as a friend. The Conservative Party is fortunate to have him on our team. Canadians can be grateful that he is a Member of their Parliament. No parliamentarian, or Canadian, should have to face this type of interference or pressure from a foreign power.
To members of the Chinese community here in Canada, Michael’s story has come as no surprise. Canadians of Chinese descent are often the victims of intimidation and threats from the Chinese Communist Party. All Canadians across the country deserve to know that the government takes their safety and security seriously, yet Canada still hasn’t shut down Beijing’s police stations operating within Canada and has failed to protect members of the community from harassment and intimidation.
The Prime Minister must finally stand up for Canadians being harassed and threatened by the Communist Party in Beijing. One of the reasons the Communist Party in Beijing views Canada as a prime target for interference is our absence of a foreign agent registry – a registry Australia and the United States currently have in place. It is past time for the Trudeau Liberals to get out of the way and ensure this registry is in place to protect Canadians.
An open, independent public inquiry is the only way to credibly investigate Beijing’s interference in our democracy and to uncover what and when the government knew about this foreign interference. Our democracy depends on it.
(Photo of Parliament Hill by festivio on Pixabay. Photo of Scott Aitchison courtesy of Scott Aitchison.)
Don’t miss out on Doppler!Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox three times per week!
Click here to support local news
I’m not really understanding this situation. How did the MP not notice that he was being targeted.
Mr. Whillans asks “what’s the difference” between Canada and China when it comes to “policy differences”. How about the fact that no one in Canada who dissents or annoys the Federal government gets “disappeared” for more than two years, like Gui Minhai. Trudeau was probably tempted to do this with Tamara Lich, but for now anyways the rule of law is still holding here. Mr. Whillans comment is offensive, given that Mr. Chong’s “policy difference” was voting to recognize the persecution of the Uighur peoples. Standing up for those oppressed people shouldn’t be a partisan issue
So…..That makes if Okay Paul?? Not in my books.
This seems like much ado about nothing. Currently Canada alone has a list of over 500 foreign citizens in over 8 countries which are targets for economic sanctions. These sanctions were put in place over policy differences. How is Michael Chong and his policy differences with the CCP any different? It would seem to be a very common practice in the world of foreign affairs